June 20, 2023: The dangers of extreme heat, supercold quantum materials and we go into the eye of a hurricane. Read more below! —Andrea Gawrylewski, Chief Newsletter Editor | | | Why this matters: In the U.S. extreme heat kills more people than hurricanes, flash floods and tornadoes combined. People in all age ranges are vulnerable to excessive heat exposure–and they may not realize it. Rates of domestic violence and crime also increase as the temps rise. Economic costs of extreme heat could reach some $100 billion in the U.S., according to the Atlantic Council.
What the experts say: Both climate change and urban development that swaps green space for pavement are warming metropolitan areas, which influences the chemistry of the atmosphere, intensifies urban air pollution and cranks up regional temperatures. | | | A heat wave struck Chicago during a week in July 1995. It caused hundreds of excess deaths (coinciding with a peak in temp). Credit: Jen Christiansen | | | Bizarre Quantum Supersolids | Why this is so cool (hot?): Researchers had observed this counterintuitive phenomenon before, but this is the first description of the physics behind it–that is, the bizarre interaction between a material's heat and its quantum nature.
What the experts say: "We had to convince ourselves with the theory that this is actually something that makes sense," says the new study's co-author Thomas Pohl of Denmark's Aarhus University. | | | The Heart of the Beast Meteorologists are keeping an eye on multiple spots in the Atlantic Ocean this week for the development of hurricanes, with at least one tropical storm now officially classified as "Bret." But what are the ingredients needed for a storm to progress into a hurricane? Earth and environment editor Andrea Thompson sat down with Kim Wood, an assistant professor of meteorology at Mississippi State University, to talk about the ingredients that make a hurricane. Listen to the latest episode of Science, Quickly.
| | | • Space-based satellites capture images of smoke and take measurements of pollution in the Earth's atmosphere with much greater coverage than monitors on the ground can manage, but they are not guaranteed to operate forever. New satellites are a large investment, yes, but their benefits to health and mortality reductions are larger, write Susan Anenberg and Kate O'Dell, both at George Washington University's Milken Institute School of Public Health. | 4 min read | | | A couple of today's articles remind me of a recent game of team trivia played by the editors of Scientific American. We were (some of us) stumped by the definition of the Rankine Scale. Without looking it up, can you guess what it measures? I'll give you a hint: It's an absolute scale of thermodynamic WHAT? First one to reply with the correct answer I'll give a shout-out to in tomorrow's newsletter. | If you have any other feedback or ideas for how to improve this newsletter, email me at newsletters@sciam.com. Until tomorrow! | —Andrea Gawrylewski, Chief Newsletter Editor | Subscribe to this and all of our newsletters . | | | Scientific American One New York Plaza, New York, NY, 10004 | | | | Support our mission, subscribe to Scientific American | | | | | | | | |