Thursday, December 16, 2021

What's Stopping Scientists from Making Viable Synthetic Blood?

The centurieslong pursuit may finally be progressing, but designing ethical ways to test these products is a sizable challenge.

Image credits: Shutterstock

What's Stopping Scientists from Making Viable Synthetic Blood?

The centurieslong pursuit may finally be progressing, but designing ethical ways to test these products is a sizable challenge.

Benjamin Plackett, Contributor

December 15, 2021


(Inside Science) -- Back in the 1600s, lacking an alternative, doctors tried transfusing milk and wine into the bloodstreams of their hemorrhaging patients. When that failed, they moved on to sheep's blood. It wasn't long before it became clear that these treatments were killing people, not saving them. Thankfully, we now know that human blood, donated by someone with a compatible blood type, is the way to go. That blood is then refined, separated into its components and screened for bloodborne diseases such as HIV.


Yet the current system is not perfect. Some countries' health care systems lack the infrastructure needed to safely collect, store and deliver blood to patients in need. Even in countries with those kinds of resources, there are communities with rare blood types for whom it can be challenging to find a match in the blood bank. Often people in these communities are ethnic minorities.


Simply put, severe bleeding requires medical care. The problem is especially acute in dangerous and remote locations such as war zones. That's why, following World War II, military scientists began to ask themselves if it might be possible to manufacture blood. Civilian researchers soon followed and so began the modern quest for artificial blood.


While scientists have not yet created a viable artificial blood product, they have achieved some advances....

Read more

Copyright 2021 American Institute of Physics. Inside Science syndicates its articles, columns, blogs and videos to news organizations. To initiate syndication, or request permission to republish our content (on a one-time or continuing basis), please contact Inside Science at insidescience@aip.org. News organizations seeking permission to republish Inside Science content must fully credit Inside Science as the original source of the content, include the author byline, and republish the original, unaltered form (excluding content titles, headlines, or sub-headlines). The reprint format can be seen here. Copyright conditions and usage terms are subject to change at any time without consent or any type of prior notice. To unsubscribe from all future mailings from Inside Science please click here. To manage your email subscriptions please click here.

Inside Science is an editorially independent news service of the American Institute of Physics

© 2021 American Institute of Physics

1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740

Scientist Pankaj

Today in Science: Humans think unbelievably slowly

...